Per California trust law, if a trustee has committed a breach of their fiduciary duty, the court can deem them personally liable for damages. The extent of liability, ultimately, depends on the severity of their offense and your situation.
Trustees may be personally liable if the assets of the charity are not sufficient to meet the indemnity. But only the people who are trustees at the time the tort was committed can be made liable in this way, unless successor trustees accept the liabilities of their predecessors.
If accountings suggest the trustee could potentially have mismanaged, misused or misappropriated trust assets, trust beneficiaries may be entitled to not only challenge those accountings in court, but to suspend or remove and surcharge the trustee as well.
Trustees must follow the terms of the trust and are accountable to the beneficiaries for their actions. They may be held personally liable if they: Are found to be self-dealing, or using trust assets for their own benefit.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
When trustees fail to follow the trust, they breach their fiduciary duty. This breach can have serious legal consequences.
Generally speaking, once a trust becomes irrevocable, the trustee is entirely in control of the trust assets and the donor has no further rights to the assets and may not be a beneficiary or serve as a trustee.
Under California law, embezzling trust funds or property valued at $950 or less is a misdemeanor offense and is punishable by up to 6 months in county jail. If a trustee embezzles more than $950 from the trust, they can be charged with felony embezzlement, which carries a sentence of up to 3 years in jail.
Depending on the complexity of the case, it may cost anywhere from a few thousand dollars to $100,000 or more to dispute the terms of a trust.
Beneficiary abuse is not acceptable in California's trust and will cases. Being appointed as a trustee or executor of a will is a big responsibility. However, some trustees and executors in California exploit this position, unsuspecting unassuming beneficiaries.
A trustee can end up having to pay taxes out of their own personal funds if they fail to take action on behalf of the estate in a timely way. Of course, they can also face criminal liability for such crimes as taking money out of a trust to pay for their own kids' college tuition.
A trustee limitation of liability clause:
limits liability to the extent of the trust assets, and more particularly to the extent that a liability “can be satisfied out of the assets of the Trust”. It should be noted that there is no need for the limitation of liability clause to refer to the right of indemnity.
Those expenses are reimbursable, regardless of whether the trust document specifies any guidelines for reimbursement. The trustee, however, would need to keep accurate records of their out-of-pocket expenses, including mileage, to be able to claim reimbursement.
Trustees are personally liable for all decisions they take in that capacity, and their liability is not automatically limited to the value of the trust fund.
A trustee must abide by the trust document and the California Probate Code. They are prohibited from using trust assets for personal gain and must act in the best interest of the beneficiaries. Trust assets are meant for the benefit of the trust beneficiaries and not for the personal use of the trustee.
A trustee typically has the most control in running their trust. They are granted authority by their grantor to oversee and distribute assets according to terms set out in their trust document, while beneficiaries merely reap its benefits without overseeing its operations themselves.
Generally, it is substantially easier to successfully contest a will than to contest a trust, and there are several reasons for this. One reason wills are easier to challenge is that testamentary laws govern wills, while contract laws govern trusts. The structure of these documents is also crucial to consider.
Generally, no you cannot sue a trust directly. Again, that's because a trust is a legal entity, not a person. It's possible, however, to sue the trustee of a trust whether that trust is revocable or irrevocable. As mentioned, in the case of a creditor lawsuit the trustee of a revocable living trust could be sued.
Although a trustee can withdraw money from a trust account for specific things, there are limits. A trustee's fiduciary duty requires them to comply with the grantor's wishes, even if they are well-intentioned. If they violate their fiduciary duties by disregarding a grantor's wishes they could be removed as a trustee.
So, yes, you can sue a trustee for negligence. Trustees have a fiduciary duty to manage the trust prudently, act in the beneficiaries' best interests, and adhere to the trust document's terms. Examples of trustee negligence include: Mismanagement of trust assets, such as poor investment decisions.
Ultimately, trustees can only withdraw money from a trust account for specific expenses within certain limitations. Their duties require them to comply with the grantor's wishes. If they breach their fiduciary duties, they will be removed as the trustee and face a surcharge for compensatory damages.
The answer to this question is generally no, although there are certain rare exceptions that could allow the trustee to remove or change a trust beneficiary, or withhold their distribution.
The trustee must act solely in the interest of the beneficiaries, avoiding conflicts of interest and self-dealing. Any breach of this duty can result in personal liability.
WHO IS THE “RIGHT” TRUSTEE? A natural first inclination is to consider a family member or trusted friend who knows you and your philosophies and values well. Family or friends may personally know your beneficiaries and their needs.
Being a trustee is also a role that can be quite time consuming, more so than most people assume. Depending on the nature of the estate, being a trustee can require quite a few hours, which can be hard to come by if the trustee also has a full-time job, a family, and/or other obligations.