A reasonable expense ratio for an actively managed portfolio is about 0.5% to 0.75%, while an expense ratio greater than 1.5% is typically considered high these days. For passive funds, the average expense ratio is about 0.12%.
What makes a good ER for a fund? For domestic stock funds in the US, an ER below 0.1% is great, below 0.25% is good, below 0.5% is fair, and below 1% is sometimes the best you can manage in an expensive plan.
10% is good. For an actively managed fund or some income based funds, . 59% is the highest I've gone. For myself, if the ratio is above . 15%, I make sure to do the due diligence of identifying what index they track, how they create that index, and generally how they justify charging a higher fee.
Generally, low-cost equity ETFs will have a net expense ratio of no more than 0.25%. Low-cost equity mutual funds will have expense ratios of 0.5% or lower. Low-cost bond ETFs often have expense ratios under 0.2%, while low-cost bond mutual funds typically have an expense ratio of 0.4% or lower.
Is 0.8 expense ratio high? For an actively managed fund, a 0.8% TER is considered relatively low. However, always compare TERs within similar fund categories. An index fund with a 0.8% TER might be considered slightly high compared to others in the same category.
Low expense ratio: VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03%, one of the lowest among S&P 500 ETFs. This is cost-effective as the value of the investment grows over time.
If an expense ratio was . 08%, that would only be $8 for every 10,000 invested.
Fund B has an expense ratio of 0.75%. Again, this tells us that it is likely an actively managed fund and that we pay $75 for every $10,000 we invest. While that doesn't sound like a lot, it can add up over the course of 30 years, or once you have hundreds of thousands of dollars invested.
Generally considered cost-efficient if the expense ratio is below 0.2%, with some options as low as 0.03%.
What is the expense ratio formula? In real life, that means if the fund spends $100,000 a year on operating costs and has $10 million in assets, its expense ratio would be 0.01, or 1%. Sometimes expense ratios are expressed as basis points, or bps.
SPY is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.0945%, versus 0.03% for VOO. SPY is up 28.31% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7.13B in YTD flows. VOO performs better with 28.36% YTD performance, and +$103.99B in YTD flows.
50% of your net income should go towards living expenses and essentials (Needs), 20% of your net income should go towards debt reduction and savings (Debt Reduction and Savings), and 30% of your net income should go towards discretionary spending (Wants).
Typically, any expense ratio higher than 1 percent is high and should be avoided. Over an investing career, a low expense ratio could easily save you tens of thousands of dollars, if not more. And that's real money for you and your retirement.
For a typical 401(k) plan, the expense ratio should be no higher than 2% and more likely in the 1.0% to 1.5% range. The lower the expense ratio the better, with higher fees eating into profits.
Equity Mutual Funds: Typically, an exit load of 1% is charged if units are redeemed within 12 months of investment. Long-term holdings usually incur no charges.
Good expense ratios can vary depending on whether the fund is actively or passively managed. Typically, expense ratios between 0.5% and 0.75% are considered 'good' for actively managed funds. Ratios above 1.5% are considered high.
The SPY comes with an 0.09% expense ratio, which is the ETF equivalent of fund management fees. An investor who invests $100,000 into the SPY ETF must pay $90 as management fees.
It can depend on the type of fund. Equity mutual fund expense ratios average 0.42%, according to 2023 data from the Investment Company Institute. Hybrid funds average 0.58% and bond funds average 0.37%. 4 A mutual fund expense ratio that is at or below the average is ideal.
The operating expense ratio is given as a percentage. A fund with a 1% ratio per annum means that 1% of the overall assets will be used to cover expenses in the space of a year. For example, with an annual expense ratio of 0.9%, the operating expenses would be $9 per $1000 invested over a year.
An optimal operating expense ratio is typically between 60% to 80%, with lower percentages indicating greater efficiency.
If the fund had a 3-year annualized pre-tax return of 10%, an investor would have taken home roughly 8% on an after-tax basis. Tax cost ratios typically fall within the range of 0-5%. A 0% tax cost ratio means the fund had no taxable distributions, while a 5% ratio suggests the fund was less tax efficient.
The Vanguard S&P 500 ETF has had a total return of 257% over the past decade. Another huge benefit of this particular ETF is that it has a very low expense-ratio fee of just 0.03%. That means if you invest $1,000, you'll pay just $0.30 in fees, and $10,000 invested in the fund will cost you only $3.
Motilal Oswal Flexi Cap Fund and Motilal Oswal Small Cap Fund gave 50.23% and 49.29% returns respectively in the mentioned period. Motilal Oswal Large & Midcap Fund offered 48.84% return in the same time period. HDFC Defence Fund, the only active fund based on defence sector, delivered 48.75% return in 2024.